![]() ![]() Releasing the cmd key fails at that point. I could imagine it crashed for example, which would explain why theīuilt-in app-switcher is showing instead. I understand that he presses the AltTab shortcut, but AltTab doesn't show I think there is a big lack of clarity as to what behavior is exhibited On Wed, at 10:05, lwouis I tried also to sleep/wake Is the app running after restart, or quitting instantly? Is the checkbox there in the System Preferences > Security & Privacy > Privacy? I say that because if restarting AltTab doesn't fix the issue, it may be that the accessibility permission has some issue. Update: another possibility is an interaction with the Accessibility permissions. "Unfortunately", I never got any problems. That could explain the issue as the system may sometimes re-grab the global shortcuts for some reason, maybe after a wake, maybe on restart, etc, and that would mean AltTab doesn't respond to it anymore. I wanted to see if maybe the way it works is "last come gets the shortcut". I also tried binding a global shortcut using System Preferences > Keyboard > Shortcuts after I start AltTab. I tried assigning the same shortcut as the app-switcher, starting/stopping AltTab, sleeping/waking my machine, etc. It seems suspiciously similar to is the above behavior exactly the same for you? Could you elaborate on the symptoms you see? I would really like to understand if AltTab is still running or if it crashed. ![]() That could be a second, different issue, like AltTab not properly releasing global shortcuts on crash for example. That wouldn't explain why releasing the cmd key fails at that point. Is AltTab opened at this point? I could imagine it crashed for example, which would explain why the built-in app-switcher is showing instead. I think there is a big lack of clarity as to what behavior is exhibited with this issue.įrom I understand that he presses the AltTab shortcut, but AltTab doesn't show up. The simulation results also show that the hyperswitch network haa ep'valent messages with localized and latency overhead for antilocal destinations (i.e., less then a 25% difference between diameter i and 5).I tried also to sleep/wake and it didn't stop AltTab from working. Detailed simulation results show that the hyperswitch network is cons&entiy more efficient than fized path routing for large message traffic conditions. This method can be accomplished in a static topology such as the hypercube network if the nodea have switching elements which are capable of performing the necessary rouh'ng header retions dynamically. Here, available or fault free paths need not be specified by a source because the routing header can be modified in response to congestion or faults encountered a9 a path is established. The method presented in this paper realizes a kind of interconnectibn network called a hyperswitch network, that is achieved using a m&we of static and dynamic topologies. 91109 University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign ABSTRACT The performance of a parallel algorithm depends in a large part on the interconnection topology of the multicomputer system. Peterson Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology Pasadena, Calif. INTRODUCTION A multicomputer interconnection network may The simulation results also show that the hyperswitch network haa ep'valent messages with localized and latency overhead for antilocal destinations (i.e., less then a 25% difference between diameter i and 5). Hyperswitch network for the hypercube computer Hyperswitch network for the hypercube computerĬhow, E. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |